What is a Restrictive Covenant?
When a homeowner purchases a home controlled by an HOA, the homeowner (and the HOA) agrees to and are bound by certain restrictive covenants. These covenants are stated in the governing documents of the HOA⎯specifically, the HOA’s Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions (“CC&Rs”). Typically (or rather, hopefully), all of the HOA’s governing documents are provided to the home buyer prior to or at closing. Unfortunately, although understandably, because these governing documents are filled with hundreds of pages of legal jargon, the vast majority of homeowners do not care to read these restrictive covenants prior to purchasing their home, nor do they even know where to look.
Here is what you need to know about restrictive covenants:
In essence, a restrictive covenant limits the permissible uses of land within the HOA. In other words, they provide the homeowner with a set of limitations as to what they can and cannot do with their property. These restrictions can be wide ranging; however, most homeowners encounter issues when attempting to modify or alter their property or landscape in some way. Restrictive covenants are treated as contracts between the homeowner and the HOA, and a breach of these covenants can result in one party seeking legal remedy against the other. A 2017 Texas Court of Appeals case described restrictive covenants as such:
“A declaration containing restrictive covenants in a subdivision defines the rights and obligations of property ownership, and the mutual and reciprocal obligation undertaken by all purchasers in a subdivision creates an inherent property interest possessed by each purchaser.”
It is important to note, however, that any restrictive covenant must not violate any Texas statute⎯most importantly, the Texas Property Code⎯or else it is a violation of Texas law. Texas Property Code §§ 202.003 & 202.004 lay the groundwork for the construction and enforcement of restrictive covenants:
Texas Property Code § 203.003
(a) A restrictive covenant shall be liberally construed to give effect to its purposes and intent.
(b) In this subsection, “family home” is a residential home that meets the definition of and requirements applicable to a family home under Chapter 123, Human Resources Code. A dedicatory instrument or restrictive covenant may not be construed to prevent the use of property as a family home. However, any restrictive covenant that applies to property used as a family home shall be liberally construed to give effect to its purposes and intent except to the extent that the construction would restrict the use as a family home.
Texas Property Code § 203.004
(a) An exercise of discretionary authority by a property owners’ association or other representative designated by an owner of real property concerning a restrictive covenant is presumed reasonable unless the court determines by a preponderance of the evidence that the exercise of discretionary authority was arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory.
(b) A property owners’ association or other representative designated by an owner of real property may initiate, defend, or intervene in litigation or an administrative proceeding affecting the enforcement of a restrictive covenant, or the protection, preservation, or operation of the property covered by the dedicatory instrument.
(c) A court may assess civil damages for the violation of a restrictive covenant in an amount not to exceed $200 for each day of the violation.
Courts tend to hold that the intent of any particular restrictive covenant shall be interpreted by a court if the covenant is disputed. However, courts will hold common law rules favoring the “free and unrestricted use of land” over all else. Furthermore, courts have held that any ambiguity in a covenant must be strictly construed against the party seeking to enforce the covenant.
While this blog is intended to be an overview of restrictive covenants, each situation and covenant is unique and deserves its own analysis as to whether it is binding on a homeowner and whether it complies with Texas law.
Julian Nacol
Nacol Law Firm P.C.
Dallas Texas HOA Attorney
(972) 690-3333
Make My HOA Pay for My Attorney!
Attorney’s fees and costs in litigation can get high quickly, especially when the other party is a Homeowner’s Association. People are often scared by the potential costs of litigating a claim against their Homeowner’s Association, which invariably leaves them wondering if they can achieve a result where their Homeowner’s Association must pay for their attorney’s fees. The answer is YES … maybe.
Pursuant to Section 38.001(b) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, “A person may recover reasonable attorney’s fees from an individual or organization … if the claim is for:
(1) rendered services;
(2) performed labor;
(3) furnished material;
(4) freight or express overcharges;
(5) lost or damaged freight or express;
(6) killed or injured stock;
(7) a sworn account; or
(8) an oral or written contract.”
For our purposes, number 8 applies primary, as it is highly likely any claims related to a Homeowner’s Association will not relate to the other items on the list. This section of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code tells us that if we can prove as a matter of law that our Homeowner’s Association breached a contract they had with us, we are entitled to recover the amount of our attorney’s fees from them.
Each Homeowner’s Association has a contract with its residents in the form of their governing documents, namely, the Bylaws and the Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions. In layman’s terms, as an owner of property within the Homeowner’s Association, a homeowner agrees to be bound by the rules and restrictions set forth in these documents. Similarly, the Homeowner’s Association agrees to be bound by a similar set of rules and restrictions. This acts as an enforceable contract between a homeowner and the Association, and if such contract is breached by either party, pursuant to Section 38.001(b) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, one party is entitled to recovering attorney’s fees against the party that breached the contract.
Additionally, pursuant to Section 5.006 of the Texas Property Code, “an action based on breach of a restrictive covenant pertaining to real property, the court shall allow to a prevailing party who asserted the action reasonable attorney’s fees in addition to the party’s costs and claim.
(b) To determine reasonable attorney’s fees, the court shall consider:
(1) the time and labor required;
(2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions;
(3) the expertise, reputation, and ability of the attorney; and
(4) any other factor.”
As implied by the name, a Homeowner’s Association’s Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions are a list of restrictive covenants (or rules) that govern the conduct of both the homeowners and the Association. According to the above Section 5.006 of the Texas Property Code, a breach of one of those restrictive covenants by either a homeowner or Association entitles the other party to recovery of attorney’s fees, similar to that of the breach of contract statute described above.
None of the above statutes imply a guarantee that attorney’s fees and costs will indeed be awarded or that if they are awarded that one necessarily receives the full amount they have paid in attorneys fees. Rather, the above statutes imply that if one can establish either a breach of contract or a breach of restrictive covenant occurred, a party is allowed to recover attorney’s fees against the breaching party. That does not mean they must recover such fees. Ultimately, the determination of the amount of attorney’s fees that a party recovers comes down to a decision of a judge or a jury at trial.
NACOL LAW FIRM P.C.
8144 Walnut Hill Lane
Suite 1190
Dallas, Texas 75231
972-690-3333
Office Hours
Monday – Thursday, 8am – 5pm
Friday, 8:30am – 5pm
OUR BLOGS
SEARCH
JOIN OUR NETWORK
Attorney Mark A. Nacol is board certified in Civil Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization